You Hadley at Hello

The outer London boroughs are full of dramatic contrasts – take Enfield where I have spent the majority of my life so far; situated at the northern most edge of London you can find properties ranging from multi-million pound sprawling mansions right down to near-derelict towering blocks of flats, plus everything in between. As you might expect my humble abode falls into the latter category but my running routes often take me over the borders into both industrial wasteland and millionaire’s row; towards the western edge of the borough in particular is an area called Hadley Wood which has homes belonging to everyone from popstars to footballers to oligarchs, plus the odd X-Factor house or two!

Not the X Factor house but an example of one of the houses I run past!

Given the wealth that oozes out of Hadley Wood it is not too surprising that it is the location of my nearest Jaguar Land Rover dealership, and after writing my post about the new Land Rover Discovery Sport last week I decided to eat my own words and take a trip to have a look for myself  – not just at the new model but also the other lush metal that lurks on the forecourt. My findings were a little mixed and although I really enjoyed the experience I was left a little disappointed with a few of Land Rover’s other models, although I still wouldn’t say no!

Evoque:

The Evoque’s interior is pretty premium but then maybe it should be considering the price tag!

Land Rover’s smallest model came across as just that…small. The Evoque is a striking looking machine in the metal, and even though it has become a familiar sight on UK roads it’s visual appeal has not been dented – especially in 3 door coupe form. Inside the cabin itself is pretty nice in terms of material choice and layout (it’s certainly a notch up from the Disco Sport) but those small dimensions mean that it is pretty cramped and the driving position is not particularly high either, which for me is a major part of the appeal for an SUV.

Discovery Sport:

The new Discovery Sport’s interior looks a lot better in real life but even then comes across as a notch down from even rivals like the Audi Q5 and BMW X3

The newest horse in the stable is the new base model in Land Rover’s line up, although size wise it is a noticeable notch up from the Evoque and because of it’s height appears noticeably bigger than rivals like the Audi Q5 and BMW X3. In the metal the Sport is more attractive than pictures suggest but it still lacks a little of the style from the Evoque and the visual clout of the brand’s larger models, especially when optioned with smaller (ie more sensible) wheels. Alas however inside is as disappointing as I thought it would be; cheaper plastics abound and although the metal bits of the cabin aren’t plastic as I thought it still lacks some of the premium atmosphere that it’s price would suggest. Thankfully though a little saving grace comes in the form of a very generous boot and those 2 extra rear seats which although very small are probably not much worse than those found in cars from the class above.

Discovery:

Attractive as it is, the current Discovery’s interior still has an air of cheapness about it despite most models costing well over £50k! Lush steering wheel though

Despite some serious reservations about things like reliability and running costs I have to admit that I’ve become seriously enamored with the current Discovery over the past few weeks. That square and imposing styling cuts quite an impression on the road and although I am not really in need of the 7 seats and massive boot, they would be handy to have along with the decent levels of kit that XS models and above receive. However I couldn’t help coming away from Hadley Wood a little disappointed in some aspects of the Discovery; the first thing may sound silly but is something that really annoyed me not just on the Discovery but also the Range Rover Sport and Range Rover too – a very low door trim which makes the car feel a lot lower to the ground than it actually is. I know this is a very pinickity issue and probably something I would get used to but the massive expanse of metal below the door pocket strikes me as odd and is not present on any X5 I’ve ever seen (although I did also notice it in an Audi Q7). Neither was I a fan of the cheapy grained plastic that can be found either side of the main controls – it looks a lot better in pictures and seems inferior even compared to my 10 year old BMW. And although the car feels massive inside (and out) I did find it odd that the middle row of seats have relatively restricted legroom, I guess to give more room for those in the rearmost seats (which incidentally are frustrating and difficult to raise and lower).

Range Rover Sport:

Although I’m not keen on the colour of this particular example the Range Rover Sport has a lovely interior, if a little cocooned. It is also the only car in the Jaguar Land Rover line-up to come with a ‘proper’ gear lever vs the pop-up cylinder that adorns the brand’s other automatic transmission-ed vehicles.

Although I am never going to be able to afford the current generation Range Rover Sport as my next car it was still very nice to be able to say I’ve had a good sit in one of my favourite cars of the last few years. Probably what struck me the most about the Sport was just how cocooned you feel as the driver; the centre console is very high as is the infotainment screen and other controls, which results in an almost claustrophobic feel more akin to a sports-car than anything this high and large. I’m not sure if that’s really a criticism but it was different, as were the vast swathes of leather across the dashboard and the touchscreen interface (which seemed pretty out of date in my opinion…a definite critique there!). The rest of the interior came across as expensive and modern but maybe not as spacious as the car’s large exterior dimensions may suggest…apart from those throne-like front seats it seemed little bigger than the Discovery Sport and although the car I saw wasn’t equipped with 3rd row seats I find it hard to imagine there being much more space there either.

Range Rover:

By far and away the best interior in Land Rover’s line-up, but then it should be when every model costs well above £75k!

The previous generation Range Rover is very much a part of my dream garage and likely will do for a long time, so it’s successor had some pretty big boots to fill when it was launched a few years back. They are not an uncommon sight on the roads of Enfield and surrounding areas so I have gotten used to the sleeker looks and Dame Edna-esque headlights, and although I prefer the squarer looks of the previous model the new one is still an attractive machine and undoubtedly is much more modern inside and out. From pictures I had assumed that the interior of the bigger Rangie was a near carbon copy of the Sport’s, but in reality they came across as very different thanks to the former’s more traditional layout versus the sportscar one of the Sport I have previously mentioned. Personally I found myself leaning towards the larger car’s cabin purely because it’s throne-like seating position and spacious layout remind me more of my own X5, and also the aforementioned ‘low door’ of the Discovery and Range Rover Sport seemed less noticeable here too. No third row can be had on the Range Rover but that’s no bad thing, although I did find the optional electric rear seats a little over-complex and pretty useless given their likely price, I also thought the electrically operated 2 piece boot was a little crass given how little effort the bottom section takes to push back into place. Unfortunately though I was not completely blown over by the big Rangie…I mean I liked it but at over £100k for the car I sat in I just didn’t think it was worth the premium over the £70k Range Rover Sport I sat in, and it certainly didn’t feel like 3x the car the new Discovery Sport is – I guess I shouldn’t worry though as I don’t have that sort of money burning a hole in my pocket!

Advertisements

8 responses to “You Hadley at Hello

  1. Yes, Evoque has striking looks and still looks as fresh today as it did when it was launched. However I agree with you, it is very small, too small really to be carrying a RR badge. I considered one a while back but it is very expensive for such a small vehicle, the rear occupants don’t get much more space than in most small hatchbacks and for a similar price I think I’d opt for the new Jag XE

    I have never liked the newer Discovery (MK3 onwards) or the RR sport as both are pretending to be something they aren’t, are too expensive for what they are and the build quality is dire. There are far superior family sized SUV’s available. The discovery doesn’t have the off road ability of a Defender or the on road manners and economy of a good estate car or even the interior space of a family saloon (Skoda Superb is far more spacious). I have never really got the point of it. For the price of a mid spec disco you can buy a good sized family estate car AND a defender and have the best of both worlds! 😉

    I would however have a proper Range Rover if I had the money. It is not pretending to be anything as it IS the vehicle that all others try to mimic including the lesser Land Rover products. It is also spacious and lovely to drive and has just enough off road ability to get where it is likely to need to go. If I could ever afford one I would likely be able to afford to buy a sapre car for when it is in the garage being fixed too 😉

    • Yes I think it would have been wiser for JLR to launch the Evoque as a Jaguar instead of a Range Rover, although admittedly the Jag brand doesn’t have as much kudos amongst many buyers. I’m not massively keen on the new XE but it would appear a much better value proposition.

      I’d agree that the Disco is massively overpriced (considering how dated it’s underpinnings are) but it is properly cavernous inside and probably more likely to be taken off road than rivals like the Q7, plus I’m a fan of how it looks though I know that’s subjective 🙂

      The current RR Sport though comes across as a bit of a bargain given that it is based on the full-size Rangie, hopefully they will be a bit more reliable than their forebears but yeah probably a good idea to have an alternative on standby…or a tow truck!

      • Is the new RR sport based on the all aluminium RR chassis then? I have to be honest and admit that I haven’t looked closely at the new RR sport as it is not my cup of tea. I was really tempted by the new RR though, alot lighter than the old model and the big diesels give it pretty good economy for its size. In a few years time second hand ones should fall into my price bracket (+5 years) and I will be very tempted 🙂

        I always like the Disco 2, in top spec form it was a very attractive vehicle retaining the handsome lines of the original disco but with more modern styling touches and was slightly bigger (they extended the rear overhand to give more space to the rear jump seats).

        Oh well in the meantime I’ll have to continue to dream and make do with the new Corsa instead…..at least I can console myself with the fact I still own two proper Land Rovers too.

  2. Yes they use the same basic platform – I find them very attractive although even the standard 20″ wheels get a bit lost and anything larger probably makes for a terrible ride (believe they do factory wheels up to 22″!). Interior wise though the full fat RR wins hands down but it will be a long while till I can afford one…economy though is meant to be better in real life than the 2.2 in the Evoque according to several long term road tests!

    The facelift Disco 2 was an attractive car and definitely has a classic look, but I think by the time it was replaced the interior/engine/handling were pretty seriously outdated, at least for those buying it as a family car or on road use (admittedly it was much better off road than rivals though!)

    I’m sure your new Corsa will be pretty entertaining – did you get the new turbo charged 1L engine? Even so it’s great to have a car (or two) that makes you smile to think of it…I do with my car and I always glance back to look at it 🙂

    • I actually went for the 1.4 turbo against all advice from the mainstream media. It is an older engine that has actually been detuned for the 2015 corsa (same engine produces 148hp in other vehicles).

      While the new three cylinder gets rave reviews from the motoring press I have had a few conversations with people that have run them for more than 30 mins which is what most reviews seem to be based on and it seems that in real world conditions their fuel economy is utterly dire, nowhere near the official (eg. 35mpg vs claimed 66mpg)

      It seems like the 1.4T gets a lot closer to its official figure and several people I’ve spoken to have managaed 45-50mpg out of it in mixed driving and 55mpg+ on the motorway. I suspect this is because the 1.4T is less stressed and has far more torque at lower rpms which is what you need in day to day driving. The little 1.0T has to be revved hard to get its power. Many motoring journalists have slagged off the 1.4T for not being a revvy engine and claiming it behaves just like a diesel engine – while they may find that bad, I find that perfect for me 🙂

      • Oh I can imagine that you’re right with the three-cylinder, I’ve heard some longer term testers averaging well below 40 and the TwinAir engine in some Fiat 500’s is meant to be even worse! My friend’s missus has recently got herself a Fiesta with the 120-ish EcoBoost so I need to ask him how she’s getting on!

  3. Pingback: Swedish for ‘Just Right’ | readingandwrighting·

  4. Pingback: Crossover Class of 2015 | readingandwrighting·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s